A project’s geographical location, topography, geotechnical conditions, remoteness and climate can all affect crusher plant design.

Construction costs are generally much greater at high altitudes, in cold climates and at remote sites. To improve the economics of such locations, modular and pre-assembled structures and plant facilities are used prior to transportation to site. Local labor costs often dictate what material can be best used economically in a particular region; for example, cement structures are much cheaper to erect in Mexico than in Alaska.

Remote projects can suffer from difficulties in obtaining spare parts on short notice. Crushing plant design should accordingly provide for laydown and workspace for onsite equipment refurbishment and repair. Where possible, equipment manufacturers should be encouraged to stock and provide spare parts close to the mining operation.

Good geotechnical information is essential to Crushing plant siting and design. Installing a primary Crushing plant on solid rock reduces the cost of concrete and structural steel.